Which supposedly also has an influence on EAT
Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 6:04 am
If there is no mention of the author and no separate experts, then Google seems to lose trust. External evaluations, awards or similar are positive in order to be perceived as an authority in one's field. Domain and company age probably play a pretty big role. Strong brands that have been around for a long time, as well as very old domains, are currently regaining a certain level of trust. Quotations and references for all information provided are extremely important.
Anyone who hides or obscures sources appears dubious to Google, or so it seems. Professional korea whatsapp writing (language, spelling, research). Many values play a role here, but good writing seems to have gained significantly in importance. In general, a striking number of winners contain content that is rather sober, serious and professionally written. Indexing of imprint, terms and conditions and all other subpages should be allowed. Google must see everything. Let Google decide how the content is then weighted.
User-generated content (comments) also seems to have a very positive effect. The more there is, the better. Conclusion on Google EAT Personally, I think Google's current development is quite dangerous. The search engine already has too much power, but now it is increasingly determining what is trustworthy and what is not. Why should a pharmaceutical company be given more trust than someone who does it on a voluntary basis or wants to raise awareness about abuses in this area, which a company would never do? According to this logic, large companies control search, which is what is currently happening, in my opinion.
Anyone who hides or obscures sources appears dubious to Google, or so it seems. Professional korea whatsapp writing (language, spelling, research). Many values play a role here, but good writing seems to have gained significantly in importance. In general, a striking number of winners contain content that is rather sober, serious and professionally written. Indexing of imprint, terms and conditions and all other subpages should be allowed. Google must see everything. Let Google decide how the content is then weighted.
User-generated content (comments) also seems to have a very positive effect. The more there is, the better. Conclusion on Google EAT Personally, I think Google's current development is quite dangerous. The search engine already has too much power, but now it is increasingly determining what is trustworthy and what is not. Why should a pharmaceutical company be given more trust than someone who does it on a voluntary basis or wants to raise awareness about abuses in this area, which a company would never do? According to this logic, large companies control search, which is what is currently happening, in my opinion.