How dangerous is duplicate content?

[sabarina38]

We know that Google doesn't particularly like duplicates , and this dislike has given rise to the crusades that have affected those who deal with the creation of websites (those who have suffered the blows of Google Panda know what you risk!).

This doesn’t mean that if you host a piece of content that has a twin somewhere on the web, one of you will get slapped in the face and sent to page 100 of Google results.

If this were the case, there would be no product sheets that are repeatedly re-proposed on various e-commerce sites, no press releases, no quotes from famous people's speeches, not to mention the mere technical errors or naivety in the organization of pages that cause duplication of materials.

Google knows that something like 25/30% of the content on the web is the guatemala whatsapp number database identical twin of someone else's content: by virtue of this, it simply "filters" what it deems redundant and lets through what it judges to be capable of offering something relevant to the user .

Problems arise only when Google perceives that the entire site is based on the practice of blatantly reproducing content from other sites in order to deceive it.

So unless you commit a reproduction:

obvious and without apparent justification
massive and repeated over time
without any mention of the original source and without any reference to why it is reproduced
You shouldn't be at serious risk of penalties.